home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- NATION, Page 19Wait Till Next Year
-
-
- Once again, the President and Congress paper over the deficit
-
-
- "Rose Garden rubbish." Up to now that richly evocative
- phrase has been used exclusively to describe what political
- lexicographer William Safire calls the "supposedly ad-lib
- remarks made by the President on minor occasions." But that was
- before George Bush and a phalanx of congressional leaders
- strolled into the Rose Garden last Friday morning to announce
- that they had hammered out the 1990 budget concordat. Now, in
- updated fashion, Rose Garden rubbish can also be defined as
- "the unveiling of a cynical, bipartisan arrangement to avoid
- difficult decisions on the deficit through the use of artful
- arithmetic, Panglossian projections and other green-eyeshade
- gimmickry."
-
- To be fair, there was little of the shamelessly
- self-congratulatory rhetoric that normally consecrates such
- empty agreements. The President called the budget pact a "first,
- manageable step" taken "in a constructive, bipartisan spirit."
- The Democrats reflected mild embarrassment over the ease with
- which they had capitulated to Bush's no-new-taxes pledge,
- something close to the Administration's defense-spending target
- and budget chief Richard Darman's strategy of forcing Congress
- to make the fiscally necessary but unpopular cuts in domestic
- programs. "This is not a heroic agreement," said House Speaker
- Jim Wright, putting it mildly. And Senate Majority Leader George
- Mitchell cautioned, "No one should be deluded into thinking that
- this is the end of a process."
-
- But is it even a real beginning? In theory, this broad-brush
- budget outline would comply with the Gramm-Rudman statutory
- requirement by reducing the deficit to $108 billion in 1990. A
- more realistic estimate puts the budgetary red ink at close to
- $130 billion. But numbers cannot convey the political timidity
- of the President and Congress in stubbornly holding the line
- against a tax hike, protecting most entitlements and refusing
- to make more than token trims in domestic and defense outlays.
- The Rose Garden agreement, in short, has spawned a Sixteen Tons
- budget that, to paraphrase the 1950s Tennessee Ernie Ford hit,
- will just leave the Government "another year older and deeper
- in debt."
-
- What the budget deal represents is the clearest evidence so
- far of the rules of engagement between the new President and the
- Democratic Congress. Unlike Ronald Reagan, who blamed Capitol
- Hill for everything but the depletion of the ozone layer, Bush
- by temperament and political calculation seems determined to
- avoid unnecessary and melodramatic showdowns. So far, the
- President has behaved like a loyal member of the congressional
- alumni association who wants to prove that he is still one of
- the guys despite his fancy new digs on Pennsylvania Avenue. Bush
- intends to block ambitious Democratic schemes to mandate that
- business provide such universal benefits as health insurance,
- but he is prepared to negotiate with Congress on consensus
- issues like the environment. As Fred McClure, the White House
- legislative liaison, puts it, "Assuming we can get them on
- board, and it goes in the direction of where we want to go,
- there's no point in going through a lot of confrontation."
-
- With the White House a seemingly permanent Republican
- bastion, the posture of congressional Democrats has become a
- defensive crouch. The ethical problems of House Speaker Wright
- further erode Democratic self-confidence. Small wonder a
- widespread reaction to the budget pact was relief. "What did we
- gain?" asked a well-placed Democratic congressional aide. "We
- protected our programs." Where once Democrats bristled with
- liberal certainty, austerity has reduced their budgetary agenda
- to preserving the remnants of the welfare state.
-
- Most of the likely conflict between Bush and Congress stems
- from both sides' periodically needing to prove their mettle to
- constituency groups. A prime illustration is Bush's
- all-but-certain veto this week of congressional legislation
- raising the minimum wage to $4.55 an hour over three years.
- There is no issue of high principle here, since the President
- supports lifting the minimum wage from the current $3.35 to
- $4.25 and congressional Democrats grudgingly accepted a
- subminimum training wage for new workers. Rather, Bush is
- trying to win points from the business community with his
- hard-line stance, while the Democrats lack the votes to override
- a veto.
-
- It is tempting to stick the label of coalition government on
- this inchoate working arrangement between the President and
- Congress. But such a moniker exaggerates the willingness of
- either side to make the hard choices needed to actually govern.
- Last week's timorous budget pact suggests that America is being
- ruled by a caretaker regime, with few signs that the nation can
- long afford such a passive form of government.
-
-
-